Traveling Through Time With the Shelby County Historical Society
Feature Article on 19th century farming. TOPIC: AGRICULTURE
Written by Jim Sayre in September, 1999

19TH CENTURY SIDNEY HAD ITS SHARE OF LIVESTOCK AS TOWN RESIDENTS WERE ENGAGED IN FARMING

Chickens, hogs, and cows once roamed Sidney’s streets as 19th century Sidney residents took an active role in agriculture within the city limits. Chickens, in fact, once helped bring financial ruin to one of Sidney’s leading industrialists, school furniture magnate John Loughlin, builder of Bonnyconnellan Castle.

Horses, of course, were kept in town, either in commercial livery stables or in privately owned small barns behind the houses, because they were the main driving force in front of buggies, wagons, and other conveyances.

Where we have parking meters for our cars in Sidney, our ancestors built special parking contraptions for their horses:  The iron hitching rack around the court year square is in process of construction. The posts, of which there are one hundred and forty-four, are set nine feet and four inches apart. The chain is one thousand three hundred and thirty-six feet long. The contractor, Philip Smith, is doing a highly satisfactory job. (Shelby County Democrat, July 1, 1887)

These hitching posts, it is thought, were melted down for military use during World War II. But, the Shelby County Historical Society has preserved two of them which will be on display at the William A. Ross, Jr., Historical Center in Sidney.

But, horses were not the only agricultural-type animals living full-time in Sidney. "Just about everybody had a chicken coop then," long-time Sidney resident Art Killian has reported. Killian was 4 years old when the 1913 flood drove his family up to the second floor of their South Miami Avenue home. "After the flood waters went down, we found a lot of dead chickens as well as cats and dogs caught in the fences."

Cows, even pigs, had long been a problem for the city fathers. The Sidney City Council’s deliberations in 1998 over a proposed cat ordinance only emphasize how much worse things could be. Well over 100 years ago, the council’s predecessors wrestled with similar ordinances, but of a larger dimension:

The cow ordinance published this week is unnecessarily severe.... It requires the owners of cows empounded to pay the Marshal two dollars for the release of a cow, which is double what it should be. The Marshal can well afford to take up a cow and empound her and release her to the owner for one dollar and it will be a severe penalty for the the poor owner of a cow to pay two dollars, near the price of two days work, to redeem his cow that has accidentally got away from him, and become empounded (SCD, May 6, 1881).

The need for such an ordinance was longstanding. For example, a Civil War-era Sidney resident took to the front page of the Sidney Journal (Nov. 4, 1864) to plead for the return of his cow:  "STRAYED AWAY.--A red spotted Cow. We miss her very much. The poor old Cow, we would like to see her back again. Now if any of our friends have seen such a Cow, wandering where she ought not, and will leave word at the JOURNAL OFFICES, we will greatly appreciate their kindness, and will make honorable mention of the same."

[Back]   [Next]   [Up]   [ New Search ]